Today, artificial intelligence(AI) tools can produce content（内容）like articles and paintings. This _______(raise) the question: Who or what should have the copyright（版权）for their _______(work)？

The US Copyright Office has recently dealt with such a case. Pictures in Zarya of the Daren（《黎明的查莉娅》）, a graphic（绘画的）novel created using the AI system Midjourney, should not have been given copyright protection, the office _______(say) in a letter on Feb 22. The novel’s author Kris Kashtanova is entitled（享有权利）to copyright for the parts of the book Kashtanova _______(write) and arranged（编排）， but not for the pictures produced _______(prep.) Midjourney, it added.

The decision is one of _______(第一个) by a US court（法院）or agency（机构）on copyright protection for works created with AI.

“The output of a generative AI model _______(依靠) directly on the creative input（输入）of the artist and is not random,” Kashtanova said on Twitter. However, the Copyright Office said Kashtanova was not the “mastermind（创意者）” behind the pictures themselves.

The case of pictures in Zarya of the Daron is not the only one that raises debate. _______(另一个） recent case is about ChatGPT.

Who should claim（拥有）the copyright of its generated（生成的）content？As ChatGPT is trained on _______ _______ _______ _______ (大量的) text from different sources（来源），it could be the creators of the source material. However, it could also be the company OpenAI, _______(so/because/and/but) it created the tool.

The law is still not clear on the copyright issues（问题）around AI-generated works like this. However, such issues are expected to change _______(rapid) over the next several years.